New York's Temporary Maintenance and Child Support Laws Cause a Redistribution of Income

Cases applying New York’s temporary maintenance and counsel fee award laws enacted last year are beginning to trickle in.    The recently decided case of J.H. v. W.H. illustrates how an award of temporary maintenance and child support will lead to a re-distribution of income.  

In the case, the husband and the wife had incomes of $107,953 and $11,660, respectively. Application of the temporary maintenance guidelines, resulted in an award of $26,708.26 per year to the wife.    

The parties had three children and the wife had physical custody of the children.  After application of the child support guidelines, the husband was ordered to pay $ 20255.13 per annum as support.  

After the award of  maintenance, child support, and taxes,  the wife would have an income of $58,252.85 and the husband  $41,000.40.   

 

Wife

Husband

Gross Income:

$11,660

$107,953

FICA/Medicare:

-369.5

-8186.92

NYC Taxes:

-1.04

-3212.23

Federal Taxes:

0

-8590.06

Maintenance:

26,708.26

-26708.26

Child Support:

20255.13

-20255.13

 

$58,252.85

$41,000.40

 The Court recognized that there had been a substantial shift in actual financial resources and the husband, despite having the higher income, was no longer “the moneyed spouse.” As a result, the Husband did not have to pay the Wife’s attorney’s fees.  

Comments (3)

Read through and enter the discussion by using the form at the end
Steven - February 29, 2012 9:11 PM

Hi,

I'm a law student looking into the recent changes in the Temporary Maintenance Law, and would be interested if there are any proposals floating out there for reforming the law, given the problems encountered at the trial court level.

Sincerely,
Steven Enriquez

Daniel Clement - February 29, 2012 10:06 PM

I believe the law reform commission is re-examining the statute. I also understand a law will soon be introduced for guideline for post divorce maintenance.

Daniel Clement

Victoria - April 8, 2012 9:44 AM

The wife might end up with more income that the husband, but this only makes sense. If she is the custodial parent and has not only herself to support she has the children to support. The custodial parent ends up putting 100% of their income into the children's household. The noncustodial parent has only themselves to support.

Post a comment

Fill out this form to add a comment to the discussion
I'd like to leave a comment. is
,
is
,
is
is