<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>New York Divorce Report - Return of Engagement Ring - New York Has Jurisdiction Over Runaway Brides - Comments</title>
      <link>http://divorce.clementlaw.com/</link>
      <description>Daniel E. Clement: New Jersey &amp; NY Lawyer &amp; Attorney for Family Law &amp; Pre-Nuptials</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:34:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:34:09 -0500</pubDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.32-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Thomas Swartz</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Couldn't the Court have used CPLR 302(a)(1) to find jurisdiction??  That provisions grants jurisdiction over anyone who, "transacts  any  business within the state or contracts anywhere to supply goods or services in the state." Is entering into a contract in NY to marry "transacting business" in NY?? Or is entering into a contract to marry to provide marriage "services" in NY supplying goods or services in the state?? I don't know, but perhaps the Court should have cited CPLR 302(a)(1) in addition to CPLR 302(b). I don't believe CPLR 302(b) by itself is sufficient.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://divorce.clementlaw.com/marriage/return-of-engagement-ring---new-york-has-jurisdiction-over-runaway-brides/#17570</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorce.clementlaw.com/marriage/return-of-engagement-ring---new-york-has-jurisdiction-over-runaway-brides/#17570</guid>
         <category domain="http://divorce.clementlaw.com/">Marriage</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 23:06:44 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Daniel Clement</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Mary</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Daughter summoned to small claims court August 25,2007. She accepted engagement ring when pregnancy confirmed 10/2003. Carlo D'Angelo arrested June 14,2004 on manufacturing meth.ecstacy=largest ever in NE USA.Daughter shocked but tried to stay with criminal until found huffing gasoline. After D'Angelo refused to care for child financially, ring sold.D'Angelo had signed paper to stop harassment over ring. July 2007, D'angelo used small claims court to regain ring or $4,000.00. judge saw receipt=$1999 and signed statement to stop harassment over ring. Judge said he would rule using WEST LAW.Daughter assaulted July,2007 sfter D'Angelo could not retrieve ring.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://divorce.clementlaw.com/marriage/return-of-engagement-ring---new-york-has-jurisdiction-over-runaway-brides/#17571</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorce.clementlaw.com/marriage/return-of-engagement-ring---new-york-has-jurisdiction-over-runaway-brides/#17571</guid>
         <category domain="http://divorce.clementlaw.com/">Marriage</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 23:06:44 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Daniel Clement</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Gail M. Volp</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>After 3 yrs. after my ex gave me the ring saying someday we would get married, we were vacationing in FL when my mother became ill.  Not only would this man not take me to the airport, but told me not to contact him any longer.  My mother passed away 2 weeks longer. This man did not<br />
come to give support, but did not contact me when he heard she had passed.  He has a great deal of my furninture, although I was only spending weekends there because I was<br />
taking care of my parents. He kept pushing me to move in, but never mentioned marriage.  I believe that I<br />
have a right to the ring as it was basically a "gift".  Comments please.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://divorce.clementlaw.com/marriage/return-of-engagement-ring---new-york-has-jurisdiction-over-runaway-brides/#17572</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorce.clementlaw.com/marriage/return-of-engagement-ring---new-york-has-jurisdiction-over-runaway-brides/#17572</guid>
         <category domain="http://divorce.clementlaw.com/">Marriage</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 23:06:44 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Daniel Clement</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Gail M. Volp</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>After 3 yrs. after my ex gave me the ring saying someday we would get married, we were vacationing in FL when my mother became ill.  Not only would this man not take me to the airport, but told me not to contact him any longer.  My mother passed away 2 weeks longer. This man did not<br />
come to give support, but did not contact me when he heard she had passed.  He has a great deal of my furninture, although I was only spending weekends there because I was<br />
taking care of my parents. He kept pushing me to move in, but never mentioned marriage.  I believe that I<br />
have a right to the ring as it was basically a "gift".  Comments please.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://divorce.clementlaw.com/marriage/return-of-engagement-ring---new-york-has-jurisdiction-over-runaway-brides/#17573</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorce.clementlaw.com/marriage/return-of-engagement-ring---new-york-has-jurisdiction-over-runaway-brides/#17573</guid>
         <category domain="http://divorce.clementlaw.com/">Marriage</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 23:06:44 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Daniel Clement</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Daniel Clement</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I can only speak for New York Law, not Florida where you live. </p>

<p>A engagement ring is a gift made in contemplation of marriage.  As explained in the post, with one exception, if there is no marriage, the ring must be returned.   There is no exception because the ex is not a nice person.</p>

<p>As for the your property, commence an action to recover it.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://divorce.clementlaw.com/marriage/return-of-engagement-ring---new-york-has-jurisdiction-over-runaway-brides/#17574</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorce.clementlaw.com/marriage/return-of-engagement-ring---new-york-has-jurisdiction-over-runaway-brides/#17574</guid>
         <category domain="http://divorce.clementlaw.com/">Marriage</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 23:06:44 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Daniel Clement</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>cheryl</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I live in california.  I have been engaged for 4 years and dating 8 years.  We are no longer together, he wants the ring back.  Whos ring is it.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://divorce.clementlaw.com/marriage/return-of-engagement-ring---new-york-has-jurisdiction-over-runaway-brides/#17575</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorce.clementlaw.com/marriage/return-of-engagement-ring---new-york-has-jurisdiction-over-runaway-brides/#17575</guid>
         <category domain="http://divorce.clementlaw.com/">Marriage</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 23:06:44 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Daniel Clement</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>bobbie</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>if the marriage was only three weeks in NY STATE , is the donor entitled to the ring back?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://divorce.clementlaw.com/marriage/return-of-engagement-ring---new-york-has-jurisdiction-over-runaway-brides/#17576</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorce.clementlaw.com/marriage/return-of-engagement-ring---new-york-has-jurisdiction-over-runaway-brides/#17576</guid>
         <category domain="http://divorce.clementlaw.com/">Marriage</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 23:06:44 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Daniel Clement</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>tim</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I proposed to my fiance on christmas day. I presented a ring to her and now she dont want to get married or return my ring. She stated that it is collateral for me living with her and not contributing to the house hold. Am I still entitled to the return of the ring or can she use the ring for staying with her as collateral when she totally agreed and wanted me to with no charge or agreement?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://divorce.clementlaw.com/marriage/return-of-engagement-ring---new-york-has-jurisdiction-over-runaway-brides/#17577</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorce.clementlaw.com/marriage/return-of-engagement-ring---new-york-has-jurisdiction-over-runaway-brides/#17577</guid>
         <category domain="http://divorce.clementlaw.com/">Marriage</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 23:06:44 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Daniel Clement</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
