The Cure For the High Rate of Divorce: Marriages With Expiration Dates
With a divorce rate hovering around fifty percent, society has long sought way to end the scourge of divorce. Legislators in Mexico may have come up with a possible solution, “temporary marriages licenses.”
As reported in the Bitter Lawyer:
Under a proposed “marital opt-out agreement,” couples will determine the time limit of their union, with two years being the minimum term and “’til death do us part” presumably being a bit longer term. The agreement will function much like a partnership agreement. Property and children (if any at the time of the marriage) are divvied up prior to marriage, much like a prenup.
No one would seriously advocate that marriages have an expiration date or that parties simply be able to walk away from their marital responsibilities with impunity. Even when couples have a prenuptial agreement, the issues of child custody and support have to be resolved when the parties divorce. Courts have an opportunity to decide if the marital agreements are enforceable; pre-nuptial agreement can, for instance, be set aside, for example, if they have been procured by fraud or undue influence.
While the idea of totally disposable marriage may look like a great idea to litigant caught in the mist of a contested divorce, a marriage by contact is simply not realistic. According to the BBC, the marriage licenses are to be renewable. Because the parties’ roles, needs and expectations will evolve and change over the course of the marriage, the marital contracts, would have to be renegotiated. I suspect these negotiations would never end well. If divorces are acrimonious and unpleasant, just imagine having the “when the marriage ends, I want. . .” negotiation with spouse you intend to stay with.

View My LinkedIn Profile
Follow me on Twitter
Married in NY Fan Page
Comments (4)
Read through and enter the discussion by using the form at the endGeorge - October 13, 2011 11:35 AM
I saw this the other day, and I don't think its a bad idea. I had not seen that the property was divided prior to the marriage, that is pretty interesting. Would like to see how this turns out.
Daniel Clement - October 13, 2011 11:38 AM
If the marriage is going to end on a date certain, why bother getting married at all? Why not just live together?
George - October 18, 2011 9:54 AM
I completely agree, it makes no sense. I wonder if they are just doing it for financial benfit. But it would make more sense just to live together for that same period of time.
Vanessa Lloyd Platt - October 19, 2011 11:11 AM
In my opinion I don't think these temporary marriage licenses will catch on. This partnership agreement sounds more like a business deal than a marriage but it will be interesting to see what happens in Mexico in a few years.