Presidential Candidates Grounds for Divorce
A number of the presidential candidates are divorced. Fred Thompson, John McCain and Rudy Guliani are all divorced. Should the reasons for their divorces be fodder for their qualifications as President?
For instance, there has been discussion on the blogosphere about Fred Thompson’s divorce based upon “cruel and inhuman” treatment. Does this mean the Thompson was a wife-beater or a victim of domestic violence? Not necessarily.
As one commenter pointed out in The Atlantic:
In New York, for instance, where a “No Fault” divorce is not an option, unless the parties are willing to be legally separated for a year, their divorce must be fault based. Cruel and inhuman treatment is one available option for a grounds based divorce.
On the other hand, we will never know if Thompson selected his grounds for divorce because it was a means to an end, a quick divorce, or because there were actually incidents of domestic violence. If an irreconcilable differences grounds for divorce was available, would the Thompson’s have pursued a divorce based on cruel and inhuman treatment?
For instance, there has been discussion on the blogosphere about Fred Thompson’s divorce based upon “cruel and inhuman” treatment. Does this mean the Thompson was a wife-beater or a victim of domestic violence? Not necessarily.
As one commenter pointed out in The Atlantic:
Cruel and inhuman treatment" (or something similar) is a common legal cause of action in the divorce law of many states. In states without no-fault divorce, one needs (or needed) a legal cause of action in order to file for divorce. One of those causes of action is "cruel and inhuman" treatment.
In New York, for instance, where a “No Fault” divorce is not an option, unless the parties are willing to be legally separated for a year, their divorce must be fault based. Cruel and inhuman treatment is one available option for a grounds based divorce.
On the other hand, we will never know if Thompson selected his grounds for divorce because it was a means to an end, a quick divorce, or because there were actually incidents of domestic violence. If an irreconcilable differences grounds for divorce was available, would the Thompson’s have pursued a divorce based on cruel and inhuman treatment?
View My LinkedIn Profile
Follow me on Twitter
Married in NY Fan Page
Comments (3)
Read through and enter the discussion by using the form at the endColleen - September 12, 2007 4:46 PM
You know, NYS is a tough state to divorce in. If there was no fault, I could be divorced by now. Instead, we both have to reside in the house with the children until our court date in Oct. 07. Where's the justice there?
Daniel Clement - September 12, 2007 5:23 PM
That is precisely the reason for a no fault grounds for divorce. Your are faced with either falsely alleging grounds or living a year separate and apart for a year pursuant to a written agreement.
Lee - February 4, 2008 10:40 AM
Coleen and her husband should be happy to be in the same house with their children rather than running out on their marraige and breaking up their family. And bringing chaos into the lives of their children. Both she and her husband should reconcile for the sake of their children and stick to their vows. Divorce laws should be even stricter so that people like Colleen and her husband will think carefully before committing to marriage and children.