<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>New York Divorce Report - Non Biological Father Liable for Child Support - Comments</title>
      <link>http://divorce.clementlaw.com/</link>
      <description>Daniel E. Clement: New Jersey &amp; NY Lawyer &amp; Attorney for Family Law &amp; Pre-Nuptials</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:57:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:57:10 -0500</pubDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.32-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>dee</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>i believe that is unfair to the presumed father if he accepted the responsiblilty under false pretenses to make him continue to pay child support.  further more it hurts the child because their denied the opportunity knowing their true identity and release the biological father from his responsibilities and you call that justice.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://divorce.clementlaw.com/child-support/non-biological-father-liable-for-child-support/#17539</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorce.clementlaw.com/child-support/non-biological-father-liable-for-child-support/#17539</guid>
         <category domain="http://divorce.clementlaw.com/">Child Support</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:03:41 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Daniel Clement</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>George</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>It is all about the money.The government is interested someone to pay-not in who pays...</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://divorce.clementlaw.com/child-support/non-biological-father-liable-for-child-support/#17540</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorce.clementlaw.com/child-support/non-biological-father-liable-for-child-support/#17540</guid>
         <category domain="http://divorce.clementlaw.com/">Child Support</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:03:41 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Daniel Clement</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>John Doe</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Believe it or not, I actually  understand the ruling of the court on this one. It doesn't make it fair to the paying father, but when courts can truly make rulings based on a 'Best Interest' standard that lacks the gender bias, then in most cases the courts get it right. However, keep in mind, if the biological mother lost custody to a FIT non-biological father, then the biological mother would have to pay for child support to the non-biological father. That is the Law; It (Law) can be your friend or it can be your enemy. Stay away from Judge Judy and all of that TV garbage. COURT IS SERIOUS BUSINESS, it is not a 30 minute television show.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://divorce.clementlaw.com/child-support/non-biological-father-liable-for-child-support/#17541</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorce.clementlaw.com/child-support/non-biological-father-liable-for-child-support/#17541</guid>
         <category domain="http://divorce.clementlaw.com/">Child Support</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:03:41 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Daniel Clement</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>George</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Dear John Doe, "THE BEST INTEREST" STANDARD is nothing more or less than ENSLAVE the nearest man with wallet.Would you like to give us an example when a bio-mother lost custody...</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://divorce.clementlaw.com/child-support/non-biological-father-liable-for-child-support/#17542</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorce.clementlaw.com/child-support/non-biological-father-liable-for-child-support/#17542</guid>
         <category domain="http://divorce.clementlaw.com/">Child Support</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:03:41 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Daniel Clement</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Duped Dad</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>What these states are doing is actually counterproductive.  What is the incentive for good men who want to marry and settle down to do so?  What is the disincentive for wives and paramours to not have affairs and ruin children's lives?  How does doing so alleviate suffering, provide justice or provide stability to society?  Isnt the courts blind and incompetent handling of this just an invitation for vigilante justice?   If the wife wants a divorce, custody, changing the child's name, provides a rotation of new "uncles" and child support from the husband how does the equitable estoppel prevent the child from "illegitimacy" and psychological harm?!.  I always thought the courts job was to force compliance to the law and to seek truth and justice.<br />
What I have seen have been cunning women who have multiple children all from different fathers.  They get more child support from three dads for three children than they would from a single dad PLUS no judge is going to split the kids up....so the mom has essentially got a moneymaking franchise.  That is what my ex-wife did and I havent seen my child in 8 years and I havent been able to afford to remarry or start a new family since.  I hope there is a special place in hell for these judges.  In their minds everything is a man's fault.  Women are just victims while men are fools.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://divorce.clementlaw.com/child-support/non-biological-father-liable-for-child-support/#17543</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorce.clementlaw.com/child-support/non-biological-father-liable-for-child-support/#17543</guid>
         <category domain="http://divorce.clementlaw.com/">Child Support</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:03:41 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Daniel Clement</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>T</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>What about if the child is aware that she is not the biological child of her 'Father'?  And shouldn't the biological father, who knows his daughter, and vice versa, be held responsible for the child support?  I think this adds insult to injury to the wronged father.  I think the mother who was unfaithful, should have to support the child.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://divorce.clementlaw.com/child-support/non-biological-father-liable-for-child-support/#17544</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorce.clementlaw.com/child-support/non-biological-father-liable-for-child-support/#17544</guid>
         <category domain="http://divorce.clementlaw.com/">Child Support</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:03:41 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Daniel Clement</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Claudine Sada</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>If a man was separated from his wife and she gets pregnant after 2 years of separation but the child still will have the husbands name but what document should he get to release him of responsibility?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://divorce.clementlaw.com/child-support/non-biological-father-liable-for-child-support/#17773</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorce.clementlaw.com/child-support/non-biological-father-liable-for-child-support/#17773</guid>
         <category domain="http://divorce.clementlaw.com/">Child Support</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:03:41 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Daniel Clement</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Shawna</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>So when this man who is supporting this child throughout his life buys groceries for the family, does he separate the "not biological" child's food and make the wife pay separately because the child is hers and not his? What happens if he has bonded with the child for 12 years and the parents divorce? Should he not be granted custody/visitation? I think that the person acting as father should pay child support because he has been doing so for several years and the child will suffer if he is not supported. </p>

<p>I am a mom and my ex has custody of our child. He remarried and the new wife calls herself "Mom" and tells everyone she is the mother of our child. My ex sued me for child support and I was able to successfully argue that since the new wife is acting as mother, then I should not be made to pay child support. Same concept.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://divorce.clementlaw.com/child-support/non-biological-father-liable-for-child-support/#26998</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorce.clementlaw.com/child-support/non-biological-father-liable-for-child-support/#26998</guid>
         <category domain="http://divorce.clementlaw.com/">Child Support</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:03:41 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Daniel Clement</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Daniel Clement</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.   do you live in New York?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://divorce.clementlaw.com/child-support/non-biological-father-liable-for-child-support/#26999</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://divorce.clementlaw.com/child-support/non-biological-father-liable-for-child-support/#26999</guid>
         <category domain="http://divorce.clementlaw.com/">Child Support</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:03:41 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Daniel Clement</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
