Mother Interferes With Visitation And Loses Custody
Continuing with a trend to penalize parents who interfere with visitation, the Appellate Division, Second Department in Adams v. Perryman, modified a joint custody agreement and granted a father sole custody of their children because the mother thwarted the father's efforts to have meaningful visitation.
While the Court's decision does not detail exactly what the mother did, the decision evidences that there is a growing judicial intolerance of one parent interfering with the other parent's visitation rights.
View My LinkedIn Profile
Follow me on Twitter
Married in NY Fan Page
Comments (4)
Read through and enter the discussion by using the form at the endAndy Srougi - January 10, 2007 10:46 PM
I am happy to see that there are some judges who have "judgement", although far to few. It is also nice to see a law firm with lawyers who seem to actually believe in the best interests of the children.
Chief justice Francois Rolland gave my bipolar schizophrenic ex-wife full custody after she abused the children continously and even after the police came to court to testify that she put them in danger. Judges in Quebec are corrupt and follow the radical feminist doctrin. Stay away from Quebec, even as a lawyer you will regret it here.
Andy Srougi
Human rights activist
Fathers-4-Justice Quebec
Jim Rand - March 1, 2007 12:45 PM
My former spouse and children't mother is interfering with my parental visitation on a regular basis. This is done with repeated phone calls to my home when with my children, bribing my children to remain home with her through use of material gifts. I have no money for an attorney, what can I do? Please advise.
Jim Rand - March 1, 2007 1:25 PM
My former spouse and children't mother is interfering with my parental visitation on a regular basis. This is done with repeated phone calls to my home when with my children, bribing my children to remain home with her through use of material gifts. I have no money for an attorney, what can I do? Please advise.
cs - December 8, 2008 7:52 PM
What can the custodial parent(the mother in this case) do if the non-custodial parent knowingly brings their child into his new home where his children by a present spouse are infested with head lice? CPS says that it's out of their hands. The mother has had to cut the daughter's hair so short that she gets teased at school by other kids. Each visit to the dad's house results in another outbreak. The dad refuses to even pay for the lice treatment and seems unconcerned that his daughter is suffering for it. When the mother refused to let him take their daughter until she could personally check his other children for lice, he called the cops on her for interfering with his visitation.The small amount he pays for child-support is insulting, esp. since he didn't want anything to do with his child for the first five years of her life. Only when ordered to pay something did he demand his rights. Aren't her rights as a parent to protect her child's health being stomped on here?