A New York Time Columnist Gets It Wrong: Pre-Nuptial Child Custody Provisions Violate Public Policy
James Andrew Miller wrote a compelling op-ed piece in the New York Times, theorizing that expensive and heart wrenching custody battles could be avoided if parties intending to marry, merely entered into a pre marital agreement. He details the understandable outrage of friends, told by their soon to be ex-spouses that they would be allowed to have visitation with their children.
However, what Mr. Miller ignores is that parties can contract to virtually any issue of the marriage except child custody and support. Any provisions would be contrary to public policy and would be unenforceable.
However, what Mr. Miller ignores is that parties can contract to virtually any issue of the marriage except child custody and support. Any provisions would be contrary to public policy and would be unenforceable.

View My LinkedIn Profile
Follow me on Twitter
Married in NY Fan Page
No comments yet
Start the discussion by using the form below